La incidencia de la opinión social en el grado de vulnerabilidad de los edificios patrimoniales. El caso del centro histórico de Popayán (Colombia)
Abstract
The urban and architectural heritage of many cities in Latin America is vulnerable to threats of various kinds; exposure to natural and anthropic phenomena are many times the causes of its destruction, however, one of the most important factors that undoubtedly tends to weaken it, is its direct and indirect relationship to committed societies and, therefore, the value that they assign it, because of that, the citizen opinion becomes a constituent element of cultural heritage preservation or destruction. This work focuses on analyzing the social opinion of the inhabitants of Popayan (Colombia), about the architectural heritage of the historical center. The surveys were designed by an interdisciplinary team of architects, environmentalists, chemists, historians, mathematics, engineering, … that work on Artificial Intelligence applied to the preventive conservation of heritage buildings, and were revised by a sociologist. The results were analyzed as a tool to determine the factors involved in the degree of weakness that historical buildings suffer and estimate the vulnerability and hazards, facing different threats.
Downloads
References
ALCALDÍA DE POPAYÁN. (2015). Plan de Movilidad para el municipio de Popayán. Informe 3: diagnóstico parte, 1°ed., Popayán: Movilidad Futura.
BENÍTEZ, J., TIRADO-HERNÁNDEZ, A., ORTIZ, R,. MORENO, M., ORTIZ, P., TURBAY, I., GARRIDO-VIZUETE, MA. (2020). “Social opinion of monuments vulnerability in historical cities”. Science and Digital Technology for Cultural Heritage, Ortiz, P (coord.) Sevilla: Taylor & Francis Group, 221-224. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429345470-41
CARABALLO PERICHI, C. (2008). “El patrimonio cultural y los nuevos criterios de intervención. La participación de los actores sociales” Palapa. Revista de Investigación Científica en Arquitectura/Journal of Scientific Research in Architecture, 3:41-49.
DANE (2019). Resultados Censo Nacional de Población y Vivienda 2018, 1ªed., Bogotá: DANE
DIAZ FUENTES, D. A. (2017). “Un método simplificado para evaluar el riesgo sísmico y priorizar la atención de los bienes culturales inmuebles: el caso de Chile”, Intervención, 8:46–62. https://doi.org/10.30763/Intervencion.2017.15.173
GARAVITO GONZÁLES, L. (2006). “El origen del patrimonio como política pública en Colombia, y su relevancia para la interpretación de los vínculos entre cultura y naturaleza”. Opera, 6:169-187.
GARCÍA CANCLINI, N. (1999). “Los usos sociales del patrimonio cultural”, Patrimonio Etnológico. Nuevas perspectivas de estudio, 1: 16-33.
GARRÉ, F. (2001). “Patrimonio arquitectónico urbano, preservación y rescate: bases conceptuales e instrumentos de salvaguarda”, Conserva. 5:5-21.
ICOMOS. (2015). Documentos de icomos, 1ª ed., Santiago de Chile: J. de N. Concha, Ed.
ICOMOS. (1999). Carta de Burra, 1ª ed., Sidney: ICOMOS Australia.
ICOMOS. “Tendencias, Amenazas Y Riesgos” en Informe Mundial 2000 de ICOMOS sobre monumentos y sitios en peligro. https://www.icomos.org/risk/world_report/2000/trends_spa.htm?fbclid=IwAR2waaCDSNTXRJD1STcIZjRml_b6c1xmhU_mT6ygSi42cMUPmZ1m197dLDY. [consulta: 3/2/2020].
LLULL PEÑALBA, J. (2005). “Evolución del concepto y de la significación social del patrimonio cultural”, Arte, Individuo y Sociedad, 17:175-204. https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/ARIS
MANZINI, L. (2011). “El significado cultural del patrimonio”, Estudios del Patrimonio Cultural, 6:27-42.
MINISTERIO DE AMBIENTE VIVIENDA Y DESARROLLO TERRITORIAL. (2006). Serie Población, Ordenamiento y Desarrollo. Guía metodológica 1: Elementos Poblacionales Basicos para la Planeación, 1ª ed., Bogotá: Dirección de desarrollo territorial.
ORTIZ, R., ORTIZ, P. (2016). “Vulnerability Index: A New Approach for Preventive Conservation of Monuments”, International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 10:1078-1100. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2016.1186758
PRIETO, A.J., TURBAY, I., ORTIZ, R., CHÁVEZ, M.J., MACÍAS-BERNAL, J.M., ORTIZ, P. (2020). “A Fuzzy Logic Approach to Preventive Conservation of Cultural Heritage Churches in Popayán, Colombia”. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 0:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2020.1737892
THE GETTY CONSERVATION INSTITUTE. (2013). Assesing the values of cultural heritage, 1ª ed., Los Angeles: De la Torre, M
TURBAY I., ORTIZ P., ORTIZ, R. (2019). “Assessment of Vulnerability Index Applied to Churches of 18th Century in the Historic Center of Popayan (Colombia)”. En Resilience and sustainability of cities in hazardous environments, Dobran, F. (coord.) New York, 26-30.
UNESCO. “Tesauro de la UNESCO” en UNESCO. http://vocabularies.unesco.org/browser/thesaurus/en/. [4/1/2020].
- Copyright and intellectual property belongs to author. Author guarantees editing and publishing rights to Ge-Conservación Journal, under a Creative Commons Attribution License. This license allows others to share the work with authorship and the original source of publication acknowledgement.
- Articles can be used for scientific and educational purposes but never for commercial use, being sanctioned by law.
- The whole content of the article is author’s responsibility.
- Ge-Conservación Journal and authors may establish additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the work version published at the Journal (for example, on institutional repositories or on a book) with acknowledgment of the original publication on this Journal.
- Author is allowed and encouraged to disseminate his works electronically (for example, on institutional repositories or on its own website) after being published on Ge-Conservación Journal. This will contribute for fruitful interchanges as also for wider and earlier citations of the author’s works.
- Author’s personal data will only be used for the Journal purposes and will not be given to others.
